Abstract

The Port of Lomé is a pivotal economic gateway in West Africa, crucial for regional trade and development, particularly for landlocked countries like Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger. This research examines its economic significance through the lenses of Structuration Theory, Critical Theory, and Comparative Advantage Theory. Structuration Theory, as articulated by Anthony Giddens (1984), frames the analysis of how communication structures within the port environment are influenced by broader socio-economic processes. It explores the role of these structures in shaping trade efficiency, governance dynamics, and regional integration initiatives. Critical Theory, stemming from Max Horkheimer (1947), provides a critical examination of power dynamics, economic inequalities, and communication practices within the port. It scrutinizes how decision-making processes and communication strategies at the Port of Lomé reinforce existing economic structures, aiming to foster more equitable distribution of economic benefits across stakeholders. Comparative Advantage Theory, coined by David Ricardo (1817), evaluates how the Port of Lomé (PAL) leverages its strategic advantages – such as deep-water access and geographical proximity – to enhance regional trade competitiveness. Methodologically, the study employs a mixed-methods approach. Quantitative analysis of the port’s statistics and economic indicators quantifies the PAL’s contribution to regional GDP and trade volumes. Qualitative interviews provide nuanced insights into stakeholder perspectives, operational challenges, and policy implications. Documentary analysis and observational studies offer historical context and governance insights crucial for understanding the port’s evolution and impact. Ethical considerations uphold research integrity and confidentiality throughout data collection and analysis processes, ensuring robust findings on the PAL’s economic dynamics in West Africa.

Keywords: Economic impact, Hinterland Countries, West Africa, PAL, Port of Lomé